The other day, while walking out at the end of a break-out
session of the Chicago Public Library’s Scholars in Residence Conference at the Harold Washington Library Center, I mentioned to my colleague, Laura Pelehach
(acquisitions editor from ALA Editions), that I wanted to meet him (finally,
after seeing him speak on a few occasions) face to face at the reception at the
end of day. A conference attendee, walking out just behind us, chimed in, “When
you do, ask him if he will be the king of the world.”
Turns out I didn’t have to (ask him to be king, that is);
before the reception, at the wrap-panel session of the CPL SIR (Chicago Public
Library Scholars in Residence) conference on Wednesday, the same attendee
suggested the royal bid to him from her auditorium seat
in the audience.
If you’ve ever seen Stephen Abram speak and you like
libraries (maybe even if you don’t) you’re likely to be fan. He has a
profession-deprecating shtick—that helps librarians loosen up, laugh at
themselves—and it seems to actually break through; Abram helps diminish the
techno-phobia and/or the ‘I’m-tired-of-technology’ attitude that could
influence whether or not the library institution remains viable in our
increasingly information-oriented society. (If a member of your target audience
shouts out that you should be king, I think, it’s possible, you could be making
an impact.)
Abram—a librarian, VP of Innovation at SirsiDynix, Canandian Special Librarian of the Year, prolific author and presenter, and all-around library-technology funnyman—can be silly,
and he pokes fun. But he also asks the hard questions and takes an unapologetic
stance when it comes to libraries and the profession’s general approach to the
technology sea inundating everyday 21st-century life. He says this technology is changing
the way libraries need to serve their patrons, old and young alike.
“Now we’ve got the Millennials, who are scary as hell. You
see them at your reference desk all the time,” says Abram. “They are
fascinating. They have some real challenges, though, in that they are being
brought up in an education system that, across North America, mostly
around the world, has been upended into a thinking-skills educational
curriculum. Because teaching kids facts is sort of useless—any fact, you know,
has an 80% deterioration rate over 8 years.”
Your Kind of Town
Along with two other tireless library promoters and
technology gurus, Jenny Levine and Michael Stephens, Abram appeared in ALA
headquarter-town Chicago this week as part of the CPL annual Scholars in Residence program, which, according to the CPL site, provides the system’s
librarians with the opportunity to reflect on the work, the changing world of
librarianship, and to exchange ideas and information.
The scholars spent the early part of the week learning about
the inner workings of the Chicago Public Library, and on Wednesday, treated
library staff and other lucky library-related professionals to a day-long
conference dedicated to “Libraries Fit for the Future.”
Abram started off the day with his presentation titled,
“Competing with Google: Library Strategies” (available at the CPL SIR site).
But before we could see him, we could hear him—he began talking to the
two-thirds-full auditorium from behind the curtain.
“Now you know how your readers feel on your Web site.” He emerges from behind the curtain and goes on: “They can’t see you, you can’t
help them, they can’t see your eyes. That’s one thing you have to remember—that
the Web site is not the librarian, or the user who is using it.”
Following an uncomfortable, strained audience chuckle,
Abram dives in.
First, there’s his animation of a patron pounding his head
against a computer keyboard until his head is squirting animated blood. “That’s what our users
feel like when they’re using our computers,” he quips. (More audible, congenial laughter
after this remark.)
Then comes the cartoon of two suits walking side by side,
one obviously carrying some papers, and the other saying, “MMM… Documents!”
“This is us,” he explains. “We need to get over some stuff.
‘Mmm, documents. Mmm, books.’ We feel we need to protect the book—because the book is threatened—which, of course, it isn’t. And we tell this to ourselves constantly, and we let it drive all of our behaviors. And then we position ourselves as people of the 18th of the century, instead of the fully diversified range of people that indeed we are now.”
Another slide in Abram’s presentation shows a snippet of
Paul Gandel’s “E-Content” article, “Libraries: Standing at the Wrong Platform,
Waiting for the Wrong Train?” Recently published in Educause Review,
Abram says the short article (as did Karen Schneider a few weeks back) is a
must-read for librarians of all type.
In his article, Gandel points to another scary prospect: “It
is not hard to imagine a scenario in which colleges and universities will shift
their resources to pay for a national information service customized to the
needs of the individual institution rather than support their own local library
reference service.”
A national information service? Hmmm… With its relentless
product-introduction cycles (every two weeks, says Abram, since the company’s
IPO), Google comes to mind.
But Is It a Threat?
According to Abram, the “big” question, the one that matters, is: How do we help libraries compete with Google? How do we position librarians and library workers for
this century?
“Well,” says Abram, “we need to enter a 12-step
program. The first thing is that we need to acknowledge there’s a problem. And
there is a problem. Who is the biggest threat to libraries right now?”
The attendees murmur, speaketh it out loud: “Google?”
Nodding, Abram then asks, “And who is Google’s customer?”
More murmuring, and then almost inaudibly—a reply that
illustrates the technological confusion that’s part of our hyper-connected
world—“We are… ?”
Lightly chastising us, Abram queries, “Do you pay them
anything? Do you design your library Web site to meet the needs of advertisers?
Do you design your algorithm on the first three pages of hits—to meets the
needs of those advertisers on those first three pages of hits? Do you let your
users believe that [their information searches come back with] non-biased,
non-manipulated result[s]?
No, no, no, and no. Clearly, librarians are not Google’s
customers in Abram’s view (and neither, really, are unbiased-information seeking users). But the reality
is, says Abram, that Google is only six-years old, that the company will
keep introducing change (“everything is in beta”), and the localized
information that it can provide (via Google Local), indeed, is positioned to give (and is positioned
to continue giving) libraries a run for their money.
Asks Abram: “What do we do when this tsunami of information
experience is coming at us, and how do we build the public library of the
future in this environment? How do we cooperate, complement, and compete with this kind of world?”
So below are Abram’s suggestions for “dealing with” Google.
Top Ten Strategies for Making It in a Google World by
Stephen Abram
1. Know Your Market
“We don’t know our
market well enough,” he states. “When 80% of your use comes in through your Web
site, what does it mean? Does it mean that the same people at the
reference desk are wandering through your library? And what do you know about
them? What assumptions do you make?”
2. Know Your Customers Better than Google
Abram points to a tool that’s helping libraries know their
customers: the Normative Data Project for Libraries, a project with the goal “to compile
transaction-level data from libraries throughout North America; to link library
data with geographic, demographic, and other key types of data; and, thereby,
to empower library decision-makers to compare and contrast their institutions
with real-world industry norms on circulation, collections, finances, and other
parameters.”
The SirsiDynix Personas Project, a public library pilot
project, will help librarians know their customers, too, he adds. Abram defines
personas as “hypothetical representations of a natural grouping of users that
drive decision-making for (development) projects.”
3. Be Where Your Customers Are
Abram: “How much of your usage is in person? Are you letting that
drive all of your behavior? Are you using instant messaging (IM)? Actually, 90% of people
between 15 and 25 have two instant messenger addresses—only 5% of people over 30 use IM. It’s the biggest technological vibe we’ve got going in society now.
Do you listen to Aaron, know about him giving his IM address to kids that came
into his library, and by doing that he doubled the [Thomas Ford Memorial Library’s]
reference statistics in the space of a few months? Half of all that library’s
reference questions are now coming from IM. And they are all from the people we
want—the kids, who you need to engage, the ones who will vote on the bond
issues when they get into their 20s.”
4. Search for the Target
“A lot of us are implementing federated search, as if we can
implement something that looks like Google but is on top of good stuff,” he reports. “Our
problem isn’t helping people to search, our problem is helping people to
find—to know where to search in the first place. If you’re doing a health
project for school, then the databases you would use as a high school kid or a
grade-six kid are different than the databases you would use as an adult or a
college student. We need to start targeting that federated search, to
differentiate ourselves, so that we have health databases for kids, historical
databases, etc. We also can do the OPAC trick,” (which, explains Abram, is
including the OPAC in every single federated search; the “trick” generally
delivers 600 to 800 percent use of your OPAC, and it increases the circulation
of your books, he notes).
5. Support Your Culture
Says Abram, “Streaming media, voice search—these are things
representative of our culture. A movie does not have to be from the 1920s, in
black-and-white reels, to be a cultural object. Our culture is about the
objects of entertainment—plays and music—happening now. That’s a huge role that
libraries play, keeping our cultural context going, and it’s important. We
denigrate it so much, saying, ‘Oh, that’s just entertainment; they are
listening to music.’ If it’s classical music from the 18th
century, only then it’s culture? Bull! It’s culture now. Whether it’s rap or not,
it’s representative of the development of our culture doing stuff.”
6. Position Libraries Where We Excel
Google answers the simple questions (who? what? where? when?) really well, Abram notes. This means librarians need to position themselves and the library to
help with finding the answers to: how? and why?
7. Be Wireless
A no-brainer. (A handy primer: Marshall Breeding’s issue of Library Technology Reports, “Wireless Networks in Libraries.”)
8. Get Visual
Implement visual representations of results, Abram asserts.
“In terms of planning activities, you have to understand who you’re working
with and how they are viewing. They use pages differently. We use all these
page metaphors to build our Web sites, and the A-Frame that we use for
newspapers, doesn’t work on Web sites; it’s an F-Frame.” (See Datamation’s
March 8, 2005, article by Brian Livingston: “How Eyetools Finds Flaws in Your Pages.”)
9. Integrate
Abram says build community context first. “It’s not about
the library! It is about five very specific user communities: learning,
research, culture/entertainment; neighborhood, and workplace.”
10. Take a Risk, for Pete’s Sake!
As any visionary, benevolent monarch would tell you, “You have to risk big to
get big,” and though “big” may not be the ultimate goal, libraries, says Abram,
need to stop being afraid to succeed—to take risks—in order to ensure that
the institution is positioned for the trek into the future.
As Gandel iterates
in his “E-Content” in Educause Review essay, “Librarians could someday find themselves in the same
situation as daily train commuters. Just because the train schedule remains the
same for 30 years, doesn’t mean that hapless commuters might not one day find
themselves standing on the wrong platform, waiting for the wrong train, unaware
that there was a schedule shift in their world order.”
All Hail the King!
Parts 2 and 3, covering Jenny Levine’s and Michael Stephens’s
messages at the CPL SIR program, will be posted next week. Meanwhile, check out
Tame the Web blog for Michael’s list of “Abram-isms.”
more…
Shop in the Bookstore Here
Throughout nearly all of the twentieth century, large companies controlled the creation, dissemination, and viewing of video information. Motion pictures started first, with television added as another layer in mid-century. Video really was a carefully controlled broadcast medium. The phrase, “Coming Soon to a Theater Near You!” captures in a nutshell how public anticipation for a new release of a movie was carefully orchestrated. Time-shifting, place-shifting, and format-shifting generally were not encouraged. 
The ACPL librarians traveled about ninety miles and spent about five hours with us. 
But as Tom Peters discussed yesterday 
Allow me to direct your attention to this white paper that Ken Chad and Paul Miller just posted at 
“Really Simple Syndication”—That’s what “RSS” stands for, says librarian Jenny Levine, whom most of you know as the library tech guru/information maven, 
I’ve heard Will Richardson (that’s him, at your right) speak twice at various conferences, including last week in Monterey; he keynoted the Internet at Schools conference that ran concurrently with Internet Librarian. 
One device I have been using intensively for more than a year is the 
Today, I attended the 
The company claims the unit “brings the market’s most impressive out-loud firepower to your iPod, iPod mini or iPod photo, along with the ability to run on batteries for use wherever you go. Patent-pending digital…